Tuesday, March 29, 2005
I'm Having A Crisis!

I've always been on the Winger side of political thought. I don't always wholeheartedly agree, but I don't believe I have a lemming mentality where politics is concerned. Still,  no matter what differences I've had with Conservatives, I still remain Conservative. I thought it was in the genes or something.

Until Terri Schiavo came along. I find everything about the Schindler position repugnant. I  mean, I don't just disagree with those people. I've come to loathe them as scheming liars.  Granted, there are personal issues attached to this situation for me, but my subjectivity notwithstanding, this issue goes beyond that. The Schindlers and their spokespeople have consistently lied about Schiavo's condition, her treatment, and her husband. The Media would have me think I should overlook these inconsistencies and exaggerations and lies because the Schindlers are a desperate, grieving family.  The media can swallow that explanation if they want to do it. I don't.  This has all become too calculated to dismiss it as simply grief getting in the way of reality.

So far the Schindlers have managed to usurp Easter. That offends me. They have interfered with children going to school. They have interfered with the operation of a Hospice - the one place where peace and dignity should not be violated for ANY patient or family member.  I find that distasteful and it makes me sick. There's been a report of a woman who was robbed of spending the last few minutes of her grandfather's life by his side because of the circus that is called Terri Schiavo Protesters. That's unforgivable.

There's more to it than the Schindler's behavior. There's having to listen to people for whom I have had respect talking like blithering morons. It's changing the way I perceive the wingers.

One of the most irritating characteristics about the fibbies for me is that they seem to latch onto an issue and assign their own interpretation of the facts. Sometimes this escalates to where they only become confused if confronted with facts.  When push comes to shove, they simply don't allow the facts to interfere with their "truth". 

Enter the Schiavo case Stage Right. 

Jeb Bush involves himself in a family matter that is none of his business. President Bush makes an emergency flight back to the White House to sign legislation to further interfere in a personal family decision. Taxpayers footed the bill for that little venture. I didn't sign on to pay for government interference in family decisions. Neither do I help pay for congressional salaries for that same purpose. I don't know if Jeb Bush really has any intention of further political service, but I hope no one forgets his behavior in this travesty should he try. I know I won't.  And I hope others remember Bill Frist's and Tom DeLay's involvement as well. I never did like either of those guys. My respect meter on them has taken a huge nosedive.

I'm starting to pay more attention to people like Barney Frank and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Good God, I actually agreed with Ted Kennedy on this issue. This is NOT supposed to happen. I'm beginning to view what I once saw as media bias as merely trying to get a word in edgewise and stick to the facts where interviews with wingers are concerned.

In addition to all of this there is the cowardly wilting away of that once strong winger support. I don't know if the polls have swayed them or if they finally see how little of what the Schindlers say has any kinship to truth. I still run across strong blogger support for the position that Terri Schiavo is being murdered, but the Congressional wingers have backed off so much of that.

No so the pundits. Pat Buchanan, with whom I often agree, is sounding like Jerry Falwell who is lapsing into Robert Schuller. I expect that from Jerry Falwell and Robert Schuller; I don't like it coming from Pat Buchannan.

And of all people, now Jesse Jackson has jumped into the fray. Shouldn't little alarm bells be jangling like millions of activated smoke detectors gone berzerk when Jesse Jackson shows up to say the Shindlers called HIM and asked HIM for HIS advice, counsel, and ohhhh my God, HIS presence? Now, it's clear that Jesse is hedging the truth on this because he's talking like he's tripled the mush in his mouth so no one REALLY knows what he's saying. But it sounded an awful lot like the Schindlers need Jesse by their side. Puhleeeeeeze.

The thing is, this will not end when Terri Schiavo dies. The Shindlers have no intention of stopping their crusade, and they've made that perfectly clear by protesting the arrangements Michael Schiavo has made for his wife upon her death. I have a feeling we'll be seeing even more of that odious Brother Paul O'Donnell and Rev Pat Mahoney. Which means some other winger is going to have to crawl out of the woodwork to talk about more religious issues. It's enough to make a Conservative-On-The-Edge weep in frustration.

It seems to me that the one person who has the best advice to offer all these people is Ferris Bueller. Before Tracy Ullman, I believe it was Ferris Bueller who said, "Go Home." And wouldn't you know...  I think Ferris would have been termed a fibbie too!

Posted at 06:22 am by Sheezah Lady
Comments (3)  




Friday, March 25, 2005
One More Time

I think I'm beginning to understand rabid dogs. Okay, well, maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, but I don't know when I have been so angry and obsessed with a topic as I am with Terri Schiavo's ordeal. I want to grab something and shake it very hard between my teeth.

After reading Jeckles, My Fearless Leader's take on this subject, I had to write on the subject again. Jeckles speculates that the wingers have hijacked Terri Schiavo's case to get at reversing Roe v Wade. At one time I would have scoffed at that notion. I'm not scoffing. He's got a point.

What is so frustrating and infuriating about this subject is that opposing sides are so repugnant once they kick it into high. And they've been running in high for more than a week now.

On the one hand, it's not enough for the wingers to insist that life is precious and Terri Schiavo should live no matter what.  They have to throw in parallels between the crucifixion of Jesus and make statements about Schiavo taking on the appearance of an Auschwitz victim. You've gotta be some kind of desperate for a point marker to make that kind of argument.

Then there's the fibbies. I was surprised at first to find myself agreeing with Barney Frank and Debbie Wasserman Schultz.  But then along came the self appointed spokesperson for the Liberals on Talk Radio, and the liberal argument went right into appalling.

Al Franken was with Joe Scarborough when he not only suggested that wingers want to kill innocent people, but he also launched into an attack on George Bush for wanting to kill black babies. As a matter of fact, Al Franken got specific -- or as specific as Franken ever gets because he has very little grasp of any facts; he just makes it up as he goes along, but he begins with a germ of truth, so he thinks that's good enough. He said that because George W Bush signed the Futility Bill into law in Tesas in 1999, this means George Bush deliberately kills black babies.

Now it just so happens that I know about this case, and I posted an entry about it HERE. Al Franken is a despicable liar for many reasons, but in this case he took the case of a 6 month old baby with a list of incurable medical problems, and he twisted it into a) a racial issue, which it was not, and b) another indictment of George Bush because Franken hates Bush. And Franken spews this garbage on public radio waves on a daily basis.  Al Franken makes me want to wash.

All of this surrounds Terri Schiavo's death, and there's nothing much we can do about it except wash. I'm very very clean these days.

Posted at 12:13 pm by Sheezah Lady
Comments (8)  




Thursday, March 24, 2005
Down To The Wire

One thing is becoming clearer and clearer in the Terri Schiavo case. No one involved in it has much credibility left. 

What is astounding is that this case has taken on the characteristics of a global death watch. In Italy, Terri Schiavo and The Pope are front page newspaper stories. I wonder if the crazy Americans are going to be accused of killing again, only this time the spin will be that we kill our own.

I think it is appalling how, simply for the high shock and repugnance factor scores, the words "kill" and "murder" are being so casually dropped. No one is scoring nearly as high as they believe they should be using those words. Very quietly, but also determindly, polls show The American People do not believe that feeding tube should be reinserted. So much for the raucus and tacky catch phrases.

The worst of the rhetoric to me has been the connection Right To Lifers are trying to draw between Terri Schiavo and Jesus Christ. It's Easter Week, and the wingers are not missing the opportunity to draw comparisons between the crucifixion of Jesus and what they term the murder of Terry Schiavo.  There's so much wrong with that verbal wander off into the absurd, I wouldn't begin to know how to adequately address it.

No one's death should become this kind of circus. Since the Federal Supreme Court has declined to hear the Schiavo case again, barring some kind of medical miracle or miracle intervention, Terri Schiavo will soon die. I hope her soul finds the peace in death her family refused to allow her at the end of her life.

Posted at 09:06 am by Sheezah Lady
Comments (3)  




Tuesday, March 22, 2005
HELP!!!!

At the moment I stand a very good chance of winning the Shitty Blog of the Month Club contest for March. This should not happen. I'm not worthy. Really. I'm not. I'm just a cheerleader, I'm not one of the main string. There's two other members of SBC that are way shittier than me, and they really do deserve to win the March title as well as that atrocious button. And I can say without a doubt that the button is atrocious because I made it. So please, PUHLEEZE  go vote in the SBC poll for anyone but me.

Go here Shitty Blog Club and vote. Please!

And I thank you for your support.... or is that lack of support? Whatever, please vote but NOT for me!

*You may have to scroll down the page... the poll is on the left*

Posted at 10:51 am by Sheezah Lady
Comments (3)  

Wacko Like A Fox?

What I really wanted to do was write a blistering rant about how Michael Jackson is getting away with manipulating the judicial system. His ridiculous see-through theatrics are wearing very thin, and I'm just hearing about it on the news. So how  are the judge and jury putting up with his nonsense? Beats me. I'd be ready to rescind his bail and toss his sorry multi-colored ass in jail for the duration of the trial if not eternity.

Michael Jackson has made a name for himself not only as a performer, but also as someone who has been flipping the bird at the world whenever and wherever he chooses. He has been straining credibility to the limit, only this time he finally got caught in a real-live grown up world. If anyone else ran around proclaiming to be Peter Pan and nuzzling children on his lap in public, that person would have, at the very least, got thrown in the loony bin. Instead, Jackson comes up with some gibberish about never having had a childhood and never wanting to grow up. Incredibly, that gets him off the hook for any and all outrageous behavior.

I don't know whether Wacko Jacko did what he's accused of doing or not. I don't believe this case against him is based on race or envy or someone's get-rich-quick scheme. He either did it or he didn't, and in my realistic corner of the world when smoke becomes a rip roaring blaze, you got yourself a fire. Jackson has been playing in flames since before he made his Pepsi commercial.

I've been wondering and waiting to see at what point someone was going to make Michael Jackson grow up and take responsibility for himself. I thought this trial was going to be the place where he couldn't get away with more childish and self-indulgent maneuvers. And then he danced on the roof of his limo. And he was late for his court appearance. And then he was late again. He had a back injury. He couldn't walk. It was an old injury that put him into excrutiating pain. Funny, when he leaped up onto the roof of that limo his back looked fine. Must have been an off day for the excrutiating pain. And no matter what level of pain he suffered, he always managed to wave to his fans. Funny how pain doesn't interfere with waving and answering reporters' shouted questions. And THEN he was late for court again.

Okay. THIS time, I stupidly thought, they've got him. It doesn't matter how many doctors in scrubs he drags with him or how many tears he sheds in court, he's manipulating this whole trial. Someone has got to stop him and make him be a grown up. Hah! Goes to show what I know.

But then I got to thinking about the old give 'em enough rope to hang themselves tenet, and it occurred to  me that maybe it's best to let this stupid clown have his way until he self-destructs. Given how things have been going so far, it is pretty likely that, given enough time, self-destruction is inevitable. And patience IS a virtue.... or so they tell me.

One of the members of the Jackson Camp (my one big goal in life is to have a Punditz Camp) appeared on a talk show and said that this trial is really difficult for Michael. He's simply not accustomed to getting up every day and having to be at a certain place at a certain time. He's accustomed to doing what he wants. And he sure doesn't want to do this.

The answer is, to my way of thinking, to revoke his bail and put him in jail. There's no better way to make sure he'll be on time for the trial than that. And maybe that's what the judge told the attorneys behind those closed doors. Maybe this WAS Jacko's LAST CHANCE. I'll believe it when I see it, but as Judy Tenuda always says, "It could happen."  I just hope the court system survives Michael Jackson intact and with some dignity.

Now I've got to go see how one goes about getting a Camp. I like the sound of that Punditz Camp thing. Anyone want to be in it?


Posted at 10:37 am by Sheezah Lady
Make a comment  




Monday, March 21, 2005
Texas Futility Law

In 1997, the Texas Legislature enacted what was known as The Futility Law. This Bill stated that a hospital or health care facility could withhold respirators or feeding tubes or extraordinary means to aid survival of a patient for whom there was no hope. Then Governor, George W Bush, with strong support from Right to Life groups, vetoed the Bill.

In 1999, the Texas Legislature once again passed a Futility Bill, only this time a provision was written into it stating that if a hospital or health care facility wanted to terminate their care of a patient, there would be a 10 day grace period during which time the family of the patient would be able to find another facility willing to take their family member.  This Bill had the support of both Right to Life groups and Governor George W Bush, so it became Texas law.

Last week the life of Sun Hudson was terminated under the Texas Futility Law. Sun Hudson was a 6 month old baby born with insurmountable health problems. He could not breathe on his own and was being kept alive with a respirator. There was no hope that Sun would ever be able to survive were he disconnected from machines and that, in fact, his condition would only deteriorate as he grew older. Doctors wanted to end Sun's life. His mother, convinced that Sun was improving, objected and filed a petition with the Texas court to keep Sun alive. Her petition was denied. Her 10 days ran out, and the hospital turned off Sun's respirator. He died a few minutes later.

Sun Hudson did receive national media attention, and parallels were drawn between his case and that of Terri Schiavo. Depending upon one's point of view those parallels may or may not be valid. What does connect the two cases is George W Bush.

I have been appalled by the Republican Party for becoming involved in the Terri Schiavo case. I have followed the Congressional involvement through the weekend, and I was disgusted by Bill Frist and Tom DeLay leading the charge to involve the US Congress in something that is none of their federal business. Everything about Terri Schiavo's case is repugnant to me. This should be a private decision made by her guardian. Instead it has become a political opportunity for Republicans to "secure their base."

Except from what I'm hearing and seeing in the media, the Republican plan seems to be backfiring. Poll after poll indicates that TAP do not believe Congress should have interfered in this case, nor do they believe that Schiavo's feeding tube should be re-inserted. If the polls are indeed indicative of public opinion, and we all know about skewed polls, then the Republicans are not getting the support they anticipated.

Except there is one little item that few media outlets are reporting. George W Bush has been consistent in his behavior on this issue. Other Republicans may have suspect motives, but where the Right to Life issue is involved, Bush has consistently supported his position to err on the side of life. In the Schiavo case what he's doing is giving a little more time for the Schiavo case to be resolved differently.

I don't agree with George W Bush in this case. I think the state of Florida gave sufficient time to the Schiavo case and made its decision. The Federal Government has no business interfering with that. But where George Bush is concerned, once again, a single fact remains clear. What you see is what you get. Many Republicans can be accused of hypocrisy because of this case, but George Bush is not one of those Republicans.

That doesn't change my mind about Terri Schiavo's feeding tube. But it does boost further my opinion of President Bush. He is consistent.

Posted at 10:13 pm by Sheezah Lady
Comments (4)  

Smack Me Silly

I just heard President Bush give another of his rousing Freedom! Freedom! Freedom! speeches on television. I don't know who he is speaking to this time; all I know is that the message never changes. I'm beginning to cringe every single time I hear the word freedom. It's becoming over-exposed.

What surprised me was that I also couldn't stand to look at President Bush. I haven't had that problem before. But listening to him talk about freedom when in the early hours of this morning he signed a bill whose intent is to keep a helpless woman prisoner for God only knows how long inside her useless cell of a body made me want to throw up. This is the hypocrisy my Liberal friends have been telling me about for years, and I never saw it this clearly for myself.

I've been a conservative most of my adult life. I find myself naturally siding with the conservative side of political issues; I don't have to be talked into that point of view, and I can defend it believing that there are good points to be made. But not this time.

The Terri Schiavo case has no business becoming a political football. If the House and Senate insist upon tossing around a hot potato or a spitball, let them stick with steroids in baseball. Just leave Terri Schiavo alone. Her case has been decided, and just because consevatives don't like the outcome of her case doesn't make it less legal or wrong.

No matter how many times Tom DeLay fires off the charges of the cratz wanting to "kill Terri", and no matter how many times Bill Frist lends his cardiology medical expertise to a neurological medical problem, the bottom line remains that what they want to do is condemn Terri Schiavo to an indeterminate time trapped inside a useless body. She will not get better.

What infuriates me more than anything else is how casually Frist and DeLay and others like them declare that the only thing Terri Schiavo can't do is feed herself. That's an outright, bold faced lie. Terri Schiavo can do absolutely nothing for herself. If she wanted to roll over in bed, and her cognitive responses have been shown to preclude even that, she cannot. She cannot comb her hair, brush her teeth, wash her face, take a bath, wipe her own behind, talk, sing, speak, and the list goes on and on. Doctors who have examined her say her cerebral cortex is gone. When that happens, there's just no 'there' there.

Those who claim to know so much about Terri without ever having spent so much as 30 seconds in the same room with her show their ignorance about more than simply Terri herself. They show their stupidity about her overall condition and about the death process.

Try going without food and water for more than 48 hours. A fully cognitive person will find that very difficult and will not be cheerful. So how could it be, according to reports from Terri's mother, that when Mom went to see Terr after Terri had been nutritionally and hydration deprived (gotta love those euphemisms), Terri was just the same as she always is. Very happy to see her mother. Very aware. Very wanting to live. Her family even tried to pass off the notion that at one point Terri managed to say, " I waaaaaaaaaaaaah", but wouldn't you just know it, someone came along and interrupted her before she could finish saying "I waaaaaaaaaaaaaaahnt to live." Those people either have no shame or have lost their own intelligence. They are now tape recording Terri's gutteral shrieks and playing them for television stations to use as "exclusive" Terri quotes.

Terri Schiavo is not cognizant. Her case has been reviewed in the Florida courts for 8 years with 19 judges. The US Supreme Court has refused to hear this case. It has been decided. Except conservatives with an agenda of their own don't want to accept that. And to further their agenda they will sentence a helpless woman to a useless life she has stated she never wanted.

I used to be proud to be conservative, and at some point I may feel that way again. But not today. 

Posted at 12:34 pm by Sheezah Lady
Comments (4)  




Monday, March 07, 2005
The Hannitizer and The Terminator

Sean Hannity interviewed Ahnuld for a segment on Hannity and Whoeverthatguyisnoonepaysanyattentionto. I tried to watch, I really did. It made my head hurt. It was the kind of exchange that puts a person in mind of beating one's head against a brick wall. It feels very good to stop.

Someone needs to instruct Ahnuld to slow down the speech pattern. Listening to his whirling dervish response to any question on topics from steroid use to homeland security is just too stressful. It's a non-stop barrage of words that after a while cease to have any meaning. There's no "there" there; there's just a rapid-fire string of gibberish.

Ahnuld reminds me of my ex-SIL. She talks like he does only with better diction. It's blabber, blabber, blabber, blabber until everyone's eyes glaze over. Occasionally she says something that sounds normal, but it's usually so buried in blabber that it's easy to miss.

One of the points Ahnuld was discussing with Hannity was steroid and growth hormone use.  He had quite a bit to say about it, it's just that most of it was unintelligible. And coming from someone who got where he is because he used whatever would make him bigger, it's kind of hypocritical for him to get on his soapbox now and talk like only some kind of fool would use such enhancements. It's just as hypocritical for him to be babbling on and on about the message we're sending to our children when the main message Ahnuld spent a whole lot of years sending to the youth of America was that the bigger you get the better you are.

If Ahnuld came right out and declared that HE was a stupid fool for using steroids, and that his subsequent heart problems may have been directly related to his steroid and growth hormone use, perhaps he'd have some credibility on the subject. Instead he's just a blabbering Governor from a state known for its oddballs.

Posted at 11:56 pm by Sheezah Lady
Make a comment  




Saturday, February 19, 2005
The Color of His Stripe

Gary Condit has a stripe down his back. It probably wraps around down there in his nethermost regions and works its way right up his front too. The color of the stripe is yellow. Like in coward's yellow.

Gary Condit is suing Dominick Dunne for some things Dunne allegedly said about Condit when Dunne appeared with Larry King as well as on some other talk show. According to Condit, the things Dunne said had to do with Condit having some extra-marital entertainment with Middle Eastern women, and in the process of his enjoyment, Condit also suggested to some Middle Eastern thugs that it would be a good idea if someone got rid of Chandra Levy for him.  Condit took offense, so he's suing Dominick Dunne for slander.

There is a lengthy list of newspapers and talkshow hosts around the country who had quite a bit to say about Gary Condit while Chandra Levy was missing. It would be impossible to count all the theories posed about Condit's involvement or non-involvement in Levy's disappearance. Out of all those who expressed opinions either verbally or in writing, Condit chose Dominick Dunne to sue.

Gary Condit has already had one session with Dunne's lawyers for a deposition in which he refused to answer certain questions posed to him by Dunne's attorneys. There is to be another session for Condit to be deposed, and this time he's under orders from the judge in the case to answer all questions.

The questions Condit does not want to answer concern whether or not he had a sexual relationship with Chandra Levy. All he admits to is that they were friends.

Now, that might fly were it not for the fact that the media built a circus around Chandra Levy's disappearance.  Levy's parents held press conferences in which they outlined how Gary Condit lied about his involvement with their daughter. Levy's aunt did interviews in which she talked about information Levy had given her about Chandra's relationship with Condit. It was not platonic nor was it purely based on friendship.

And then there was the matter of his affair with Anne Marie Smith. He denied that too, but he lied. And the media was right there to capture it all. Some of us may need to bone up a little on all those past facts, but the truth remains that Gary Condit looked guilty as hell of something, and the reason he looked that way was because of the way he handled himself. He would have been better off letting it rest. But no, he wants to sue and receive damages from Dominick Dunne who writes for Vanity Fair.

Here's where the yellow streak enters stage left.  (It has to be stage left because Condit is a liberal and everyone knows they're never right.)

Gary Condit apparently wants to take his case to the people. He wants to get his side of the story out there in advance of any more publication of his personal business. HOWEVER, is he doing this himself? Hah! Noooooo. Instead he's sending his daughter, Cadee Condit out to speak for him. Last night Cadee Condit appeared with Greta Van Susteren, and Cadee made a fool of herself... Big Time.

If Cadee had been allowed to simply give her version of the story and then get off the set to allow other lawyers to discuss what she'd said, it might not have been so bad. But Cadee stayed on after her interview part of the show was over, and she took on Greta's panel of lawyers. One of these lawyers was Georffrey Fieger, another was Ted Williams, and there were at least two others whose names I don't remember.  It so happens that Ted Williams is a lawyer, but he's also a former police detective for the Washington, DC police department, and Fox News brought him in during the beginning of the Levy case to discuss both police department procedure as well as the law.

Last night Cadee Condit thought she was going to take on both those men as well as two other savvy lawyers in defense of her father.  It was a disaster.

I thought all the lawyers, particularly Fieger who is not always known to be the most courteous person on the planet, handled Cadee Condit with kid gloves in an effort not to offend or insult her. It was clear from the outset she had no intention of showing an ounce of respect to any of the lawyers on the panel. Even Ted Williams, who goes out of his way to placate everyone with whom he may even slightly disagree, was getting somewhat rattled by Condit's attitude.

The thing is, attitude was all she brought to the table. Cadee Condit seemed to think if someone said something she didn't like, all she had to do to refute it was talk louder and longer than the others. She ended up sounding like a screeching harpie more than once. And when it came right down to facts, she lost the battle every time.  She fought all the same old talking points with the same arguments that didn't work the first time around when Chandra Levy first went missing.

When some adult is hellbent on making a fool of herself, I say sit back and let her have at it. But in this case it occurred to me that it should have been Gary Condit making his own case and taking his own heat. What kind of man sends his child out to fight his battles for him, particularly when his child either naievely or calculatedly will have to do some considerable spinning about Daddy's peccadilloes.

The Washington, DC police say that Gary Condit is not a suspect in Chandra Levy's murder, and it may very well be that Condit had absolutely nothing to do with it. But no one will ever convince me that he is an honorable man who did anything to help Levy's family or the police as much as he could have when she first went missing.  I didn't think too much of the man during the time the Chandra Levy story had so much attention. After seeing what he allowed his daughter to do in his place last night, I think even less of him now.

Posted at 07:41 am by Sheezah Lady
Comment (1)  




Friday, February 11, 2005
Privacy or Insanity?

Should a parent be able to eavesdrop on a child's telephone conversation, or is that an invasion of a child's privacy?

Apparently the answer to that depends upon what state the eavesdropping takes place.  Recently Washington State decided that parents do not have the right to eavesdrop on their children's telephone calls because it violates the child's right to privacy.

I think the state of Washington has lost its collective mind.

I have two children. The older one was born to test the patience of Job, Mother Teresa, and any Saint that comes to mind.  I had this feeling that if given the opportunity she'd lie about her own name if it would benefit her in some way. Sure enough, I found out at one point that she had, in fact, lied about her own name. And mine. And her father's. Well, that kind of depends upon which father she was talking about at the time. She invented several of them. I wasn't old enough to have done everything she attributed to me by the time she was in high school. She hasn't changed much since. You get the picture.

The younger one is completely different. I mean the exact opposite. To the extent that if she told me it was raining frogs, I'd fully expect to hear croaking.  This is probably going to sound like a gratuitous statement, but my older daughter takes after her father - the real, one and only one. He's a dick. Nuf said.

When the older daughter was growing up and still living under the homestead roof, I didn't start off my career as a mother by thinking it was my job to snoop into her room or her belongings or listen in on her phone calls. I believed for a long time that kids deserve a certain amount of privacy. Now, I'm not going to air the family dirty laundry here, but there was a point at which I got blindsided with information that proved to me that I had no clue what my older daughter was all about and what she was up to.

So I began checking on her. And it's a damn good thing I did, because I was responsible for her until she was 18 years old, which means legally I was accountable for what she did. My ignorance was not an acceptable excuse if she got into trouble and I was sued or whatever. As far as the family was concerned, I saw her as violating my trust. Once that was gone, I couldn't believe much of anything she said. Legally, I was not about to be held responsible for her behavior if I could help it. The only way I could help it was to make myself aware of what she was doing no matter what she said that was. She lied. That changes the whole dynamic.

Now I'm hearing some advocate for children's rights telling me that parents have no business checking on their children.  We pay the bills for the electricity and the phone service our children use. But we should have nothing to say about how they use or abuse what we provide? We may be liable if our children break the law before they are 18 years old, but we have no right at all to know what they're doing?

That's flat out nuts. But if states want to enact laws like that which make it virtually impossible for a parent to take parental responsibility seriously, then I think parents should be able to divorce those problem children rather than be driven crazy by willful, disruptive, and yes, dangerous behavior. I want to be able to go to sleep at night knowing one member of the household will not burn the house down, because I have done whatever I could to make sure that doesn't happen. It's not something I'm willing to leave to chance. And if my eavesdropping on a telephone call allows me to prevent a bunch of teenagers from getting drunk and doing God only knows what to themselves or someone else, then I'm going to eavesdrop. If the law doesn't like it, then the law can decide what to do with the brats who thought that was a good idea in the first place. And they can leave me out of it completely.

If it takes place in my house and I'm going to be liable for it, then I deserve the right to know what's going on. I'm willing to keep up my end of that deal. Why in the hell would states want to fuck with that?

Posted at 11:11 pm by Sheezah Lady
Comments (13)  




Next Page

What You Should Know About Me...


Name: Sheezah Lady
Age: 104
Location: Maiphensed Inaria, USA
Person I Wish Were Real So I Could Go Stand And Gawk Until My Eyeballs Fall Out: Denny Crane
Passions: Reading, Blogging, Knitting, The Sims
Dislikes: Ferrets, Phil Donahue, Creamed Onions, Bugs, Doggie Barf

More Of Me, Come And See More Of Me...

Sighed Effects

Sighed Lines







My Hero



   









Contact Me

If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed